View source for WikiCigar:Citation needed

{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}}
{{pp-30-500|small=yes}}
{{Information page|pages= [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] policy|shortcut=WP:CITENEED|shortcut2=WP:NEEDCITE}}

{{Notice|A complete version of the documentation for this template is provided at [[Template:Citation needed]]. If you are new to editing and instead just need a general overview of how sources work, please visit the [[Help:referencing for beginners|referencing for beginners help page]].}}
[[File:Webcomic xkcd - Wikipedian protester - English.svg|thumb|upright=1.3|alt=Innovative application for the template in xkcd 285 (Wikipedian Protester)|The {{Tl|Citation needed}} template aims to promote [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|accountable]] discourse.]]
To ensure that all Wikipedia content is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], Wikipedia provides a means for anyone to question an [[Wikipedia:Citing sources#When and why to cite sources|uncited claim]]. If your work has been tagged, please provide a [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable source]] for the statement, and [[Help:Using talk pages|discuss]] if needed.

You can add a citation by selecting from the drop-down [[File:VisualEditor - Cite Pulldown.png|40px|alt="cite"]] menu at the top of the [[Wikipedia:Tutorial/Editing|editing box]].<!--note that this is the same in markup or Visual Editor, hurrah for simplicity--> In [[Help:Wikitext|markup]], you can add a citation manually using [[Wikipedia:Citingsources#How to place an inline citation using ref tags|ref tags]]. There are also [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|more elaborate ways to cite sources]].

In [[Wiki#Editing|wiki markup]], you can question an uncited claim by inserting a simple <code>{{tl|Citation needed}}</code> tag, or a more comprehensive {{tnull|Citation needed|reason{{=}}''Your explanation here''|date{{=}}{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}. Alternatively, <code>{{tl|fact}}</code> and <code>{{tl|cn}}</code> will produce the same result. These all display as: 

{{quotation|'''Example:''' 87 percent of statistics are made up on the spot.<!--{{Citation needed}} begin-->{{fix |link=Wikipedia:Citations needed |text=citation needed |class=Template-Fact }}<!--{{Citation needed}} end--> }}

For information on adding citations in articles, see [[Help:Referencing for beginners]]. For information on when to remove this template messages, see [[Help:Maintenance template removal]].

==When to use this tag==
A "citation needed" tag is a request for another editor to supply a source for the tagged fact: a form of communication between members of a collaborative editing community. It is never, in itself, an "improvement" of an article. Though readers may be alerted by a "citation needed" that a particular statement is not supported, and even doubted by some, many readers don't fully understand the community's processes. Not all tags get addressed in a timely manner, staying in place for months or years, forming an ever-[[:Category:Wikipedia backlog|growing Wikipedia backlog]]—this itself can be a problem. Best practice recommends the following: 

*Tag thoughtfully. [[WP:TAGBOMB|Avoid "hit-and-run" or pointed tagging]]. Try to be courteous and consider the hypothetical fellow-editor who will, we hope, notice your tag and try to find the citation you have requested. When adding a tag, ask yourself: Is it clear just what information you want cited? Is the information probably factual? (If it is not, then it needs deletion or correction rather than citation!) Is the knowledge so [[WP:BLUE|self-evident]] that it really does not need to be cited at all? (Some things do not.) 
* Some tags are inserted by people well-placed to find a suitable citation themselves. If this is the case, consider adding these articles to [[WP:Watchlist|your watchlist]] or a worklist so that you can revisit the article when you have the opportunity to fix any [[WP:V|verifiability issues]] yourself.

==When not to use this tag==
Before adding a tag, at least consider the following alternatives, one of which may prove much more constructive:
*Do not use this tag because you [[template:clarify|don't understand a statement]], or feel that [[template:confusing|"non-expert" readers are likely to be confused]]. Use {{tl|Clarify}}, {{tl|Explain}}, {{tl|Confusing}}, {{tl|Examples}}, {{tl|Why}} or {{tl|Non sequitur}}, as appropriate, instead.
*If the content is nonsense or is unlikely to be true, [[WP:Be bold| be bold and delete it]]!
*Do not tag controversial material about living people that is unsourced or poorly sourced. [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Remove unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material|Remove it immediately!]]
*Per [[WP:DIARY]], do not tag excessively trivial claims. Remove them.
*If you are sure the statement you want to tag is not factual, even if it does not come under either of the preceding headings, it may be more appropriate to simply remove the text (delete it!). Be sure to add a suitable edit summary, such as "Very doubtful – please add a citation if you return the content". If the original statement was accurate after all, this gives someone the chance to put it back, hopefully with a proper citation this time.
*If a statement sounds plausible, and is consistent with other statements in the article, but you doubt that it is totally accurate, then consider making a reasonable effort to find a reference yourself. In the process, you may end up confirming that the statement needs to be edited or deleted to better reflect the best knowledge about the topic.
*If an article, or a section within an article, is under-referenced, then consider adding an {{tl|Unreferenced}}, {{tl|Refimprove}}, or {{tl|Unreferenced section}} tag to the article or section concerned – these tags allow you to indicate more systemic problems to the page.
*A reference at the end of a paragraph typically refers to the whole paragraph, and similarly a reference at the end of a sentence may almost always be taken as referring to the whole sentence. If a particular part of a sentence or paragraph seems to require a separate citation, or looks as if it may have been inserted into the text at a sentence or paragraph level, try to check the original reference rather than adding tags to text that may already be well referenced. The extra parameters available in the {{tl|Citation needed span}} template may allow you to indicate which section you want to refer to.
*Do not insert a "Citation needed" tag to [[WP:Point|make a point, to "pay back" another editor, or because you "don't like" a subject, a particular article, or another editor]].

==If your work has been tagged==
*If you can provide a [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable source]] for the claim, then please add it! If you are not sure how to do this, then [[Wikipedia:Be bold|give it your best try]] and [[Wikipedia:Tutorial/Editing|replace]] the "Citation needed" template with enough information to locate the source. You may leave the [[Copy editing|copyediting]] or [[WP:Wikify|Wikifying]] to someone else, or learn more about [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|citing sources on Wikipedia]]. [[Help:Introduction_to_referencing_with_VisualEditor/1|This beginners' referencing guide for Wikipedia]] provides a brief introduction on how to reference Wikipedia articles.
*{{anchor|Consensus on the template}}{{Shortcut|WP:CITENEEDREMOVE|WP:NEEDCITEREMOVE}}If someone tagged your contributions with a "Citation needed" tag or tags, and you disagree, discuss the matter on the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]]. The most constructive thing to do in most cases is probably to supply the reference(s) requested, even if you feel the tags are "overdone" or unnecessary.

==How to help reduce the backlog==
Currently, there are {{PAGESINCATEGORY:All articles with unsourced statements}} articles with "Citation needed" statements. You can browse the whole list of these articles at [[:Category:All articles with unsourced statements]].

Frequently the authors of statements do not return to Wikipedia to support the statement with citations, so other Wikipedia editors have to do work checking those statements. With {{PAGESINCATEGORY:All articles with unsourced statements}} statements that need [[WP:Verification]], sometimes it's hard to choose which article to work on. The tool [https://tools.wmflabs.org/citationhunt/en Citation Hunt] makes that easier by suggesting random articles, which you can sort by topical category membership.

<div class="plainlinks" style="text-align:center">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/citationhunt/en <span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-progressive" style ="margin:.1em">I can help! Give me a random citation to find!</span>]</div>

==See also==
* [[Template:Citation needed]]
* [[Template:Citation needed span]]
* [[Template:Verify source]]
* [[Template:Unreferenced]] for an article (rather than an individual statement) which does not cite any references or sources.
* [[Template:More citations needed]] for an article (rather than an individual statement) that has some citations, but not enough.
* [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles|Template messages – Sources of articles]]
* [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup#Inline with article text 6|Inline verifiability and sources cleanup templates]]
* [[Wikipedia:Verification methods]] – listing examples of the most common ways that citations are used in Wikipedia articles
* [[Wikipedia:Citing sources/Example edits for different methods]] – showing comparative edit mode representations for different citation methods and techniques.
* [[Wikipedia:Citation templates]] – a full listing of various styles for citing all sorts of materials
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Reliability]]
* <!-- Do not remove the colon! If you do so, this page will be counted as unsourced. --> [[:Category:All articles with unsourced statements]] – list of all pages with {{tl|citation needed}}

== External links ==
* {{commons category-inline|Citation needed}}
{{Inline cleanup tags}}
{{Wikipedia referencing|state=collapsed}}
[[Category:Citation and verifiability maintenance templates|*{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Wikipedia basic information]]
[[Category:Wikipedia quick introductions]]