RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This Template:Talk other is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
Script error: No such module "Redirect template". When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized. |
RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act has certain extraterritorial applications, but that plaintiffs must prove injuries within the United States for the Act to apply.[1] The decision received criticism in the Harvard Law Review for potentially restricting access to American courts for litigants from outside the country.[2]
The case was brought by the European Union's member states. RJR Nabisco (and several subsidiary organizations) were accused of engaging in cigarette smuggling and tax evasion.
See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 579
- List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court
References
- ↑ Liptak, Adam (20 June 2016). "Supreme Court Sides With R.J. Reynolds in RICO Case". The New York Times. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
- ↑ "RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community". Harvard Law Review. 130. 10 November 2016.
External links
- Text of RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community, 579 U.S. ___ (2016) is available from: Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)
Categories:
- Redirects from moves
- United States Supreme Court cases
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
- 2016 in United States case law
- United States tobacco case law
- R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
- Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
- European Union law
- United States–European Union relations
- United States federal jurisdiction case law
- All stub articles
- United States Supreme Court stubs